Skip to content
Discover Royal River Center, the leading business hub in Ni…

Could Additional Countries Follow Australia's in Restricting Online Networks for Youth Under Sixteen?

Australia's controversial policy to prohibit social networking access for young people below 16 is sending ripples worldwide. Politicians, campaigners, and families are watching closely to see if this tactic will set a precedent for countries abroad.

European Movement

Across Europe, a increasing chorus of states are exploring parallel measures.

  • The Danish government plans a restriction on social media for under-15s, with the PM stating that phones and networks are "robbing our youngsters' innocence". A law is expected to be enacted next year.
  • Norway is preparing to implement a access barrier of 15, citing the need to shield young people from the "influence of the AI".
  • Ireland is introducing a digital ID system to confirm the identity and age of social media users. The media minister have indicated that an similar ban is "a potential tools in reserve".
  • In Spain, the prime minister has called on the legislature to approve a proposal increasing the legal age for joining social media to 16.
  • In The French government, the head of state has floated the idea of a ban for those under fifteen, and a legislative committee has endorsed a related action, including an overnight "internet blackout" for adolescents.
  • The administration in The Dutch government has recommended parents to prevent their children from social media up to the age of 15.

Across the European Union, the European parliament has adopted a symbolic motion supporting a ban for minors unless guardian approval is granted. While it highlights of the "compulsive" nature of these platforms, the move does not establish mandatory rules.

"A clear age barrier is a solid foundation," commented one European lawmaker behind the resolution.

The United Kingdom: An Evidence-Based Approach

For the United Kingdom, the administration has not ruled out a possible ban, arguing that "no option is discarded" but maintaining any action must be "supported by robust research".

Last year, support grew behind a legislative effort to introduce limits on social media use by teenagers, but it was in the end modified. Nonetheless, the administration vowed to conduct more studies the topic.

Campaign organizations have voiced apprehensions. A prominent charity set up by the relatives of a young person who was lost after viewing disturbing online content contends that a blanket age ban could fail to improve online safety and could result in a "sudden drop-off" of exposure when teens reach the legal age.

"The Australian ban is a response to the inability of the social media companies to design products and services that are secure and suitable for minors," said a leading peer.

The US: A Decentralized Landscape

Across America, regulation is largely unfolding at the regional level amid country-wide gridlock.

  • The state of Utah requires adult approval for those under 18 to use social media and controls late-night use.
  • Florida has signed a bill banning under-14s from creating accounts on social media, though it is entangled in court battles.
  • Virginia has enacted a law capping under-16s to 60 minutes of social media use per day, with extra time dependent on a guardian's okay.
  • Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have likewise introduced laws demanding adult authorization for teenagers to open social media presences.

Despite widespread concern and calls from some figures to mimic the Australian path, a US-wide ban is right now seen as unlikely.

Global Views

Outside of these regions, additional nations are similarly exploring options.

  • Malaysia plans to prohibit social media for under-16s beginning next year.
  • Brazil has lifted the access age for Instagram to 16.

But, world bodies take a more nuanced stance. A major UN agency has cautioned that age-based restrictions have downsides and "might backfire". The organization notes that social networks can be a "critical link" for isolated young people and that regulation should not be a "excuse" for platform operators to improve user protection.

As this global discussion evolves, the policies of this nation and its followers demonstrate that policymakers internationally are increasingly prepared to wait for platforms to self-regulate.

About the author

Marcus Jackson

Lena is a seasoned business strategist with over a decade of experience in commercial real estate and corporate development.

Royal River Center

Type to search articles.